OralVision

US Patent Application #64/057,644 · Patent Pending

The problem

Oral cavity cancers are highly treatable when detected early, yet nearly 70% of cases are diagnosed too late due to clinical uncertainty and the lack of accessible screening tools. As a result, over 170,000 people die each year from a largely preventable disease. OralVision is an intraoral, deep-learning-powered diagnostic device designed to make early screening affordable, reliable, and widely accessible.

Over the past decade, oral cavity cancer rates have skyrocketed across the United States as a result of increased human papillomavirus (HPV) exposure. While oral cancer is quite treatable when caught early, nearly 70% of cases are diagnosed in the later stages, largely because malignant oral mucosa lesions are often misdiagnosed as visually similar benign conditions like canker sores and fibromas.

In fact, a recent study published in MDPI’s Healthcare journal showed that 54% of oral cancer cases were misdiagnosed by dental practitioners and senior students, exemplifying the scale of diagnostic errors in the field of oral oncology.

This diagnostic gap is only exacerbated by inequitable access to advanced healthcare technologies in underprivileged communities, with over 30% of people living in these areas reported to have limited access to proper dental care. Even in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), which are dedicated to serving the healthcare needs of low-income populations, cancer screening rates are substantially lower than the national average.

Unfortunately, this combination of diagnostic uncertainty and healthcare disparities leads to over 170,000 deaths annually across the world, raising debates over whether existing diagnostic solutions are adequate to address the silent threat that oral cavity cancers pose.

Most oral cancer imaging devices utilize fluorescence spectroscopy to illuminate abnormal tissue, but these methods cannot differentiate between benign and malignant lesions. Therefore, final diagnoses ultimately depend on unreliable visual examinations or expensive biopsy procedures that are often not feasibly accessible for people living in impoverished areas. Moreover, these fluorescence-based devices can cost over $2,000 per unit, further alienating clinics that serve low-income communities from utilizing affordable diagnostic tools.

OralVision aims to ameliorate these issues by offering a highly accurate, deep-learning-based imaging tool that is over 3 times cheaper than alternatives, ultimately contributing to decreased oral cavity cancer rates.

REV3 engineering drawing of the OralVision handheld device: front, bottom and side orthographic views with dimensions in millimetres, alongside an exploded view labelling the Arducam OV5642 camera shield, XIAO-ESP32-C6 microcontroller, Adafruit bq25185 USB, DC and solar charger with 5V boost board, AA nickel metal hydride battery holder, image capture button, USB-C charging port, and the ridge for the snap-fit enclosure.
The assembled OralVision V1 prototype, a black 3D-printed handheld with a metal capture button and the camera at the tip.
Top-down view of the assembled prototype, showing the medical-grade capture button on the body and the OV5642 camera board seated in the tapered nose.

The device

The control center for OralVision’s imaging device is a XIAO-ESP32-C6 microcontroller, a low-cost yet powerful solution to reduce costs while maintaining the technical capabilities of larger, more expensive controllers. The image is taken using an OV5642 5 MP Image Sensor with SPI compatibility for high-bandwidth image data transfer to the microcontroller.

Additionally, an anti-fog nano coating is applied to the camera lens to prevent moisture in the mouth from harming the internal components. To minimize user error, the entire system uses a single medical-grade momentary push button to control image streaming and capturing.

The power is regulated using a 5V voltage regulator to prevent current spikes when alternate charging methods are used. The regulator accepts multiple power sources, including USB-C (with a port for easy charging access), AA batteries, and solar power (for extremely low-income areas with minimal electrical infrastructure). The imager also ships with rechargeable Nickel Metal Hydride batteries to prevent thermal runaway during transportation.

The entire system is then enveloped in a sterilization wrap to prevent bacteria and microbes from entering the device. The prototype’s housing is held together using a snap-fit mechanism to provide easy access to the electronics for battery replacements and software updates.

The only notable disadvantage that OralVision has in comparison with existing solutions is the fact that the device is quite bulky and not ergonomically optimized. However, we have plans to make the device frame more streamlined to maximize patient comfort in future prototypes.

System diagram: an OV5642 image sensor and push button feed an ESP32-C6 over SPI, which sends the capture over WiFi to a Raspberry Pi 5 running a TensorFlow Lite DenseNet121 model through a Flask API, which outputs disease probabilities and exchanges model updates with a global model server.

The software

OralVision employs a three-layer distributed architecture optimized for low-latency medical imaging while considering the physical and resource constraints of its target clients:

  • Sensing Layer - Arducam OV5642 5-MP image sensor and a 140-degree camera lens to maximize coverage and image quality while minimizing image capture latency.
  • Processing Layer - ESP32-C6 with a WiFi 802.11b/g/n transceiver to wirelessly transmit image data to the inference layer utilizing a Flask WiFi Access Point on a Raspberry Pi 5.
  • Inference Layer - The Pi has 16GB of SDRAM for model loading and communicates with the device using Flask and the RESTful API. Once the image data is transmitted, the Raspberry Pi analyzes the image with TensorFlow Lite and outputs the possible diseases and their probabilities.

For communication protocols with OralVision, we used SPI and Wifi. We decided on SPI over UART and I2C because of its faster speeds and continuous data transfer, minimizing latency and allowing for high resolution images to be transmitted quickly.

We then transfer our images to our ML interface wirelessly using Wifi 5, where our Federated Learning model then processes the images and outputs our results to the screen on our interface. When a device processes an image, it alters neural parameters to improve the accuracy of our main model, which clients can download from our website for software updates.

We used a variety of techniques while developing our ML model to get this high accuracy rate:

  • Data Augmentation - We augmented our limited training data using geometric and lighting transformations.
  • DenseNet121 Architecture - We used DenseNet121 as our model architecture due to its enhanced ability to form neural connections.
  • L2 Regularization - We used L2 regularization to ensure our model was not overfitted on our data by ensuring no specific decision points were given too large of a weight in the decision making process.
  • Multi-Step Gradual Training - We initially trained only a head layer, later unfreezing the rest of the model to gain more accuracy with this multi-phase training.

However, we realized that solely basing our model on publicly available training data would allow competitors to easily create comparable models using similar techniques. Therefore, we transformed our standard ML model into a federated learning model that allows for constant inputs of new, HIPAA-compliant patient data that competitors cannot copy.

This shift to federated learning allows us to negate biases that may have been present in our training data, improve our model’s parameters, and stay ahead of major market competitors.

In testing, OralVision significantly outperformed existing market solutions. Our model achieved an overall accuracy of 87.15%, with a ROC-AUC score of 0.9417 and an F1 score of 0.8655. By comparison, VELscope, a widely used competing technology, has demonstrated accuracy rates near 53% in experimental trials.

On video

The presentation

Slide 1 of 11

All projects